[1]景铭,戴君武.消能减震技术研究应用进展侧述[J].地震工程与工程振动,2017,01(03):103-110.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2017.03.103.jingm.011]
 JING Ming,DAI Junwu.New advances of research and applications of seismic energy dissipation technology on 16WCEE[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2017,01(03):103-110.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2017.03.103.jingm.011]
点击复制

消能减震技术研究应用进展侧述
分享到:

《地震工程与工程振动》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
01
期数:
2017年03期
页码:
103-110
栏目:
论文
出版日期:
2017-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
New advances of research and applications of seismic energy dissipation technology on 16WCEE
作者:
景铭 戴君武
中国地震局工程力学研究所, 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
Author(s):
JING Ming DAI Junwu
Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
关键词:
消能减震技术阻尼器发展趋势
Keywords:
seismic energy dissipation technologydamperdeveloping trend
分类号:
TU352;TU398
DOI:
10.13197/j.eeev.2017.03.103.jingm.011
摘要:
围绕第16届世界地震工程大会(16WCEE)所发表的关于消能减震技术研究和应用的重要成果,本文对调谐质量阻尼器TMD、屈曲约束支撑BRB、黏滞阻尼器以及其它相关类型消能减震技术的最新进展进行了梳理。从调谐质量阻尼器TMD的有效性评估及其设计应用所面临的问题与改进方法,屈曲约束支撑的连接构件性能、优化及其研发和应用,黏滞阻尼器应用中的构件性能提升方法、空间优化布置方法以及性能评估方法,以及磁流变阻尼器等其它消能减震技术的发展等4个方面分别作了概括性评述和展望,提出了有待进一步研究的若干问题。
Abstract:
In this paper, the significant achievements of seismic energy dissipation technology in 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering were reviewed including the latest researches and applications of tuned mass damper, buckling-restrained brace, viscous damper and other types of energy dissipation technologies. The general comments and prospects were focused on the following four aspects:the evaluationof the effectiveness of the tuned mass damper and its application problems as well as improving methods; the connected component performances and optimization for buckling-restrained braces along with research developments and applications; the improvement methods for the component performances of viscous damper, optimization methods for damper layout and performance evaluation methods; the ascendant energy dissipation damping technique of magneto-rheological damper, etc. Some problems to be researched further were also summarized in this paper.

参考文献/References:

[1] Siepe D, Nawrotzki P, Alvarado M R. Retrofitting of a hospital using a tuned mass Control System[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, 2017,Paper No. 4953.
[2] Elias S, Matsagar V A, Jangid R S, et al. Distributed multiple tuned mass dampers for seismic response control of chimney with flexible foundation[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.20.
[3] Huber P. Seismic damping systems with TMDs for high rise buildings[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.41.
[4] Zhang Q, Lu X L, Zhao B, et al. Shaking table test and numerical analysis of tall building using a new eddy-current tuned mass eamper[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No. 265.
[5] Gilda E, José L A, Diego N, et al. Damage balance of asymmetric structures with nonlinear behavior by means of a tuned mass damper[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.431.
[6] Garrido B, Sarrazin M. Effectiveness of tuned sass dampers(TMD) for earthquake protection in chilean buildings[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1077.
[7] Kurino H, Kurokawa Y, Kano N, et al. Development of large tuned mass damper with storoke control system for seismic upgrading of existing high-rise building[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.3533.
[8] Lu Z, Zhang D C, Chen X Y, et al. An experimental investigation into the use of partical tuned mass damper[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.268.
[9] Lopez R H, Miguel L F, Beck A T. Robust design of tuned mass dampers for passive control[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.2454.
[10] Sutcu F, Bal A, Fujishita K. Near full-scale experimental investigation of low-standard RC frames retrofitted with bucking restrained braces[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.569.
[11] Xu W, Pantelides C P, Robinson K, et al. Hysteretic performance of new generation bucking restrained braces[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.2531.
[12] Jinsenji T, Yoshizawa M, Tsukagoshi H, et al. Seismic retrofit of existing 256 m high building by installing seismic dampers for long-period earthquake ground motions[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.3478.
[13] Inamasu H, Skalomenos K A. Experimental investigation of bolt-configured naturally bucking brace with gusset plate connection[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.619.
[14] Sitler B, MacRae G. Buckling restrained brace connection and stability performance isssues[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1380.
[15] Westeneng B, Lee C L, MacRae G, et al. Out-of-plate bucking behaviour of BRB gusset plate connections[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1419.
[16] Matsuda Y, Kasai K. Fundamental study using new test loading scheme for steel frame subassembly with damper connection details[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1943.
[17] Zhao J, Lin F, Wang Z. In-plane seismic frame action effects on buckling-restrained brace welded end connection performance[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.4775.
[18] Inamasu H, Skalomenos K A. Experimental investigation of bolt-configured naturally buckling brace with gusset plate connection[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.619.
[19] Tsai C S, Liu Y, Liu B Q. An experimental study of buckling restrained brace with inspection windows[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1231.
[20] Xu W, Pantelides C P, Robinson K, et al. Hysteretic performance of new generation buckling restrained braces[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1276.
[21] Thammarak P, Mai T T, Htun L H, et al. Development and testing of cam-grip type, compression free energy dissipative brace[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1985.
[22] Chancellor N B, Sause R, Ricles J M. Design and validation of steel self-centering concentrically-braced frames[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.2705.
[23] Brando G, Matteis G D. Buckling Inhibited Metal Shear Panels:A new damper based on the development of the BRB concept in the 2D space[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.3069.
[24] Morral M, Herrera R, Beltrán J, et al. Numerical model for buckling restrained braces using an alternative confining material[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.3461.
[25] Wang C L, Zhou L, Liu Y. Developing a new bamboo-shape buckling-restrained brace[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.4018.
[26] Chhabra J P S, Rai D C. Experimental evaluation of aluminum core buckling restrained knee braced truss moment frame under cyclic loads[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.4198.
[27] Wei X, Bruneau M. Experimental performance of buckling restrained braces subjected to bidirectional displacement histories[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.819.
[28] Garrido B, Sarrazin M. Effectiveness of tuned mass dampers (TMD) for earthquake protection in chilean buildings[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1077.
[29] Xu J, Cornejo G F. Optimization of buckling restrained braced frame rnder seismic loading[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1117.
[30] Jones A S, Lee C L, MacRae G A. Design and behavior of buckling restrained braces[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1257.
[31] Zsarnóczayá, Vigh L G. Effective design measures against soft story fevelopment in buckling restrained braced frames[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.4356.
[32] Binder J, Christopoulos C, Gray M. Seismic response of hybrid ductile-rocking buckling restrained braced frames with cast steel supplemental energy dissipation elements[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.4450.
[33] Mazza F, Mazza M, Vulcano A. Nonlinear seismic response of irregularly masonry-infilled R.C. framed buildings retrofitted with hysteretic damped braces[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.476.
[34] Yang P, Sun Y B. An equivalent design method to improve seismic performance of step-terrace RC moment frames by viscous dampers[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1418.
[35] Bazaez R,Dusicka P. Seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge bents utilizing hysteretic dampers[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.2730.
[36] Aydin E, Ozturk B, Cetin H, et al. Application of viscous dampers for prevention of pounding in adjacent reinforced concrete buildings[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.3768.
[37] Infanti S, Castellano G M. Fluid viscous dampers of the lzmit bay bridge, turkey:design requirements and full-scale testing[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.4116.
[38] Burgos M. Influence of layout of fluid viscous dampers in their effectiveness for seismic protection of buildings[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.662.
[39] Brás I, Guerreiro L. A new methodology for the optimal placement of dampers on tall buildings[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1902.
[40] Puthanpurayil A M, Lavan O, Dhakal R P. Multi-objective loss optimization of seismic retrofitting of moment resisting frames using viscous dampers[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1321.
[41] Ishii M, Oyama T, Udagawa T. Proposal for new deformation amplification system to increase effect of seismic dampers[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.717.
[42] Fukuda R, Kurino H. Highly efficienet semi-active oil damper for structural control with energy recovery system[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1500.
[43] Zhou Y, Shi F, Deng X S. Experimental study on properties of high-damping rubber damper[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1530.
[44] Jamshidiha H R, Yakhchalian M, Mohebi B. Investigation on the ability of intensity measures for reliable seismic collapse assessment of steel SMRFs with linear viscous dampers[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.4344.
[45] Sasaki K, Kasai K. New analytical model for viscous wall damper based on refined material testing and analysis[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.4830.
[46] Landi L, Vorabbi C. Simplified reliability assessment of RC frames equipped with viscous dampers[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.2259.
[47] Zhong K, Zhou Y. Seismic isolation of high-rise buildings using the friction pendulum system with fluid viscous dampers[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.164.
[48] Lu L Y, Chu S Y. Development of a semi-active friction damper for seismic structures by using leverage mechanism[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.256.
[49] Velazquez O, Galasso C, Duffour P. A loss-based control algorithm for magnetorheological dampers combined with earthquake early warning[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.4705.
[50] Li P Z, Yang J P, Lu X L. Analysis on seismic performance of building with viscous dampers considering soil-structure interaction[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.862.
[51] Enomoto T. Analytical study on damping effect of building considering dynamical interaction between soil and building[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.1291.
[52] Shirai K. Use of shaking table tests to obtain optimal damper characteristics of passive vibration control structures considering soil-structure interaction[C]//16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Paper No.376.

相似文献/References:

[1]何志明,周云,陈清祥.剪切钢板阻尼器研究与应用进展[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,(06):124.
 HE Zhiming,ZHOU Yun,CHEN Qingxiang.Advance in research and application of steel shear panel dampers[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2012,(03):124.
[2]薛素铎,石光磊,庄鹏.SMA复合摩擦阻尼器性能的试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2007,(02):145.
 XUE Suduo,SHI Guanglei,ZHUANG Peng.Performance testing of SMA incorporated friction dampers[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2007,(03):145.
[3]邓雪松,王廷彦,陈麟,等.巨型框架-耗能支撑结构的减震性能分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2008,(05):146.
 DENG Xuesong,WANG Tingyan,CHEN Lin,et al.Analysis of the damping performance of mega frame with energy-dissipating braces structure[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2008,(03):146.
[4]禹奇才,刘春晖,刘爱荣.一种放大位移型SMA阻尼器的减震控制分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2008,(05):151.
 YU Qicai,LIU Chunhui,LIU Airong.The analysis of structure vibration control by using shape memory alloy dampers with magnifying story drift[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2008,(03):151.
[5]邓雪松,聂一恒,汤统壁,等.某周期比超限偏心结构地震反应控制分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2009,(03):153.
 DENG Xuesong,NIE Yiheng,TANG Tongbi,et al.Earthquake response and control analysis of an eccentric structure with dampers[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2009,(03):153.
[6]高建勇,胡晓,张艳红,等.某大型升船机塔柱结构模型振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2013,04(05):083.
 GAO Jianyong,HU Xiao,ZHANG Yanhong,et al.Shaking table test on a structural model of a large ship lift tower[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2013,04(03):083.
[7]谢强,赵亮.屈曲约束支撑的研究进展及其在结构抗震加固中的应用[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,(03):100.
 Xie Qiang,Zhao Liang.Research on buckling-restrained brace and its applications to structural seismic retrofitting[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2006,(03):100.
[8]滕军,李祚华,高春明,等.耗能模块型钢板阻尼器复合连梁设计及应用[J].地震工程与工程振动,2014,01(02):187.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2014.02.187.tengj.025]
 TENG Jun,LI Zuohua,GAO Chunming,et al.Design and application of steel plate damper composite coupling beam made of energy dissipating module[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2014,01(03):187.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2014.02.187.tengj.025]
[9]毛晨曦,王大磊,王涛,等.安装SMA阻尼器的钢筋混凝土连梁拟静力试验[J].地震工程与工程振动,2014,01(04):140.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2014.04.140.maocx.018]
 MAO Chenxi,WANG Dalei,WANG Tao,et al.Pseudo-static tests of reinforced concrete coupling beams equipped with SAM dampers[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2014,01(03):140.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2014.04.140.maocx.018]
[10]鲁亮,刘霞,陈俊杰,等.基于弹塑性静力分析方法的一种摇摆式钢筋混凝土框架抗震性能研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2015,01(02):124.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2015.02.124.lul.014]
 LU Liang,LIU Xia,CHEN Junjie,et al.Seismic performance study on a rocking reinforced concrete frame with pushover analysis[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2015,01(03):124.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2015.02.124.lul.014]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-3-21;改回日期:2017-4-25。
基金项目:地震行业科研专项经费项目(201508023);国家科技支撑计划课题(2015BAK17B02);中国地震局创新团队发展计划资助项目
作者简介:景铭(1993-)女,硕士研究生,研究助理,主要从事结构抗震减震研究.E-mail:879197292@qq.com
通讯作者:戴君武(1967-)男,研究员,博士,主要从事结构抗震减震研究.E-mail:jwdai@iem.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01