[1]黄勇,张良,乐威杰,等.桥梁抗震研究的近期进展[J].地震工程与工程振动,2017,01(03):166-174.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2017.03.166.huangy.018]
 HUANG Yong,ZHANG Liang,LE Weijie,et al.Recent development of seismic research on bridge[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2017,01(03):166-174.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2017.03.166.huangy.018]
点击复制

桥梁抗震研究的近期进展
分享到:

《地震工程与工程振动》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
01
期数:
2017年03期
页码:
166-174
栏目:
论文
出版日期:
2017-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Recent development of seismic research on bridge
作者:
黄勇 张良 乐威杰 车泽鑫
中国地震局工程力学研究所, 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
Author(s):
HUANG Yong ZHANG Liang LE Weijie CHE Zexin
Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
关键词:
世界地震工程大会桥梁抗震研究进展
Keywords:
World Earthquake Engineering Conferenceseismic design of bridgedevelopment of research
分类号:
TU4
DOI:
10.13197/j.eeev.2017.03.166.huangy.018
摘要:
近期在智利圣地亚哥召开的第16届世界地震工程大会汇集了世界地震工程领域最新研究成果,有关桥梁抗震研究方面的论文就有90多篇,主要涉及大跨度桥梁的抗震设计、基于地震可恢复性的桥梁减震隔震措施、桥墩的抗震性能研究、桥梁的碰撞与接触问题、桥梁的地震反应分析等方面的内容。本文就这些方面的内容进行分类汇总和介绍,并谈了几点体会。很显然,桥梁抗震研究的发展趋势也会与整个地震工程界倡导的可恢复性的抗震设计理念同步,在可方便替换“保险丝”构件、摇摆自复位体系、更有效的减震隔震措施等方面有所推进。从大会报告的内容看,减隔震装置和桥墩自复位体系都是当前桥梁抗震研究的热点课题,如果将两者同时用于桥梁体系,进行优化设计,会有更好的抗震效果。
Abstract:
The 16th World Earthquake Engineering Conference, recently held in Santiago, Chile, brings together the latest research in the world’s seismic engineering field. There are more than 90 papers talked about the seismic research on bridge, which include the seismic design for long span bridge, resilience by design and anti-seismic system, the seismic performance of bridge piers, pounding and contact problem of bridge, the earthquake response analysis of bridges etc. This paper first summarizes and introduces the content of bridge seismic research. And then the experience of recent research progress in the field was talked about. It is clear that the development trend of bridge seismic research will also be synchronized with the seismic engineering community to promote the resilience of seismic design concept. It is going to be developed in the replaceable "fuse" components, the self-centering system, and isolation system. From the contents of the report, the anti-seismic system and the self-centering system of the pier are the hot topics of the current seismic research of the bridge. If the two are used for the optimized design of the bridge system at the same time, there may be better seismic effect.

参考文献/References:

[1] Li J Z. Recent advances in seismic design for long span bridge in China[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Keynote.
[2] Mahin S. Resilience by design:a structural engineering perspective[C]//16WCEE. Santiago,2017, Keynote.
[3] Clemente P, Martelli A. Anti-seismic systems:worldwide application and conditions for their correct use[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Keynote.
[4] Ventura C E. Advances on monitoring and damage detection in earthquake engineering[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Keynote.
[5] ?elebi M, Ghahari S F, Taciroglu E. Responses of the carquinez, california suspension bridge during the Mw6.0 South NAPA Earthquake of August 24, 2014[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 30.
[6] Siringoringo D M, Fujino Y. Over twenty years seismic monitoring experience of cable-stayed bridge:lessons learned on structural assessments[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 3975.
[7] Lau D T, Desjardins S, Tehranian A, et al. Dynamic structural health monitoring of confederation bridge:lessons learned, challenges and future directions[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No.4400.
[8] Mashal M, Palermo A. Experimental testing of emulative and post-tensioned earthquake damage resistant technologies for accelerated bridge construction[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 641.
[9] Ameli M J, Pantelides C P, Parks J E, et al. Grouted splice sleeve connections for precast bridge substructures in seismic regions[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 1060.
[10] Li C, Hao H, Zhang X. Cyclic tests of precast segmental concrete columns with unbonded post-tensioned tendons[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 1747.
[11] Al-Jelawy H, Haber Z, Mackie K. Grouted splice precast column connections with shifted plastic hinging[C]//16WCEE, Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 2711.
[12] Sritharan S, Cheng Z, Vander Werff J, et al. New connections for precast girders to cap beams in concrete bridges[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 2646.
[13] Liu R, Palermo A. Quasi-static testing of a 1/3 scale precast concrete bridge utilising a post-tensioned dissipative controlled rocking pier[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 806.
[14] Ou Y C, Yuniati Pratiwi A, Bu Z Y, et al. Equivalent viscous damping for self-centering precast concrete segmental bridge columns[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 4907.
[15] Guerrini G, Restrepo J I, Schoettler M J. Self-centering, low-damage, precast post-tensioned columns for accelerated bridge construction in seismic regions[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 3921.
[16] Titirla M, Zarkadoulas N, Mitoulis S, et al. Rocking isolation of bridge piers using elastomeric pads[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 4040.
[17] Yen P, Aref A. Development of seismic design details for accelerated bridge constructions[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 4044.
[18] Chegini Z, Palermo A. Quasi-static testing of a large-scale bridge with dissipative controlled rocking connections in the superstructure[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 1372.
[19] Obara T, Watanabe H, Kono S, et al. Damage controlling performance of a full scale unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete beam[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 1882.
[20] Lara O, Toro D, Ventura C. Designing for damage accumulation and low cyclic fatigue in reinforced concrete bridge columns[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 2285.
[21] Jung D, Andrawes B. Dyngmic testing on circular rc bridge columns retrofitted and repaired with shape memory alloys[C]//16WCEE. Santiago,2017, Paper No. 976.
[22] Giouvanidis A I, Dimitrakopoulos E G. Seismic reliability assessment of rocking bridge bents with flag-shaped hysteretic behavior[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 1259.
[23] Yi J, Li J. Shake table studies of seismic damage and failure mode of a single tower cable-stayed bridge[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 1371.
[24] Wei X, Bruneau M. Experimental performance of buckling restrained braces subjected to bidirectional displacement histories[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 819.
[25] Wang Y, Ibarra L, Pantelides C. Seismic assessment for retrofitted skewed reinforced concrete bridges with buckling restrained braces[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 2531.
[26] Cheng X, Erochko J, Lau D T. Improving the seismic performance of existing bridge structures using self-centering dampers[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 3465.
[27] Ben Hamadi B, Buchin-Roulie V, Grandi A, et al. Railway bridge seismic protection with the isosism range[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 3543.
[28] Turkalj G, Dorka U E. Vibration mitigation in bridges using integrated semi-active control concepts[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 2204.
[29] Fujita R, Sadamatsu M, Takahashi Y. Analysis on damage of the existing seismic isolation bridge due to the 2011 great east japan earthquake[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 1226.
[30] WANG K H, ZHANG P P, YANG J P, et al. Seismic design method of small and medium spans bridge considering bearing friction slipping[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 72.
[31] Luders C, Criado M. A new design philosophy of seismic anchor elements for bridges[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 4562.
[32] Domaneschi M, Martinelli L, Cimellaro G P, et al. Immediate seismic resilience of a controlled cable-stayed bridge[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 482.
[33] Shi Z, Dimitrakopoulos E G. Nonsmooth seismic response analysis of a straight bridge with deck rotation induced by abutment impact[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 796.
[34] Amjadian M, Agrawal A K. Torsional response of horizontally curved bridges subjected to earthquake-induced pounding[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 900.
[35] Wu S, Buckle I G, Itani A M. Experimental and analytical study of girder unseating in skew bridges during earthquakes[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 1140.
[36] Kun C, Jiang L, Chouw N. Effect of pounding and soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of skewed bridge[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 1465.
[37] Chai S, Ghaemmaghami A R, Kwon O. Simplifeid approach in analyzing inelastic behavior of shallow foundation subjected to dynamic loads[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 3391.
[38] Chaudhary M T A. Seismic soil-structure interaction in bridges:does the answer lie in soil or structure?[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 157.
[39] Song S T, Hu T F, Chiou D J. Variation in seismic performance of bridges caused by riverbed scour[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 81.
[40] Zeng Q, Dimitrakopoulos E G. Seismic response analysis of an interacting train-bridge system considering derailment[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 1568.
[41] Huang Y, Liu J L. Seismic performance of hydropower plant and highway system during the 2015 Gorkha Earthquake in Nepal[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 2925.
[42] Li H, Sun G, Luo R. Collapse of baihua bridge during the 2008 wenchuan earthquake:finite element analysis with a multi-scale model[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 926.
[43] Bas S, Apaydin N M, Harmandar E. The effects of multi-support earthquake excitation on seismic performance of the bosphorus bridge[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 3845.
[44] Li Z X, Chen Y, Shi Y D. Collapse analysis of a long-span reinforced concrete continuous bridge under the extreme earthquakes[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 4511.
[45] Kibboua A, Bechtoula H, Mehani Y, et al. Seismic vulnerability evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridge structure[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 917.
[46] Ni Y, Lu G, Yang X, et al. Ida-based research on displacement ductility and seismic fragility of continuous girder bridge in high-speed rail[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 3670.
[47] Petti L, Mammone A. Reliability analysis of seismic isolation in retrofitting of simply supported bridges[C]//16WCEE. Santiago, 2017, Paper No. 4171.
[48] McDaniel C C, Uang C M, Seible F. Cyclic testing of built-up steel shear links for the new bay bridge[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(6):801-809.
[49] 黄勇, 王君杰, 韩鹏,等. 考虑支座破坏的连续梁桥地震反应分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(增2):217-223. HUANG Yong, WANG Junjie, HAN Peng, et al. Seismic response analysis of continuous bridges taking account of bearing failure[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(S2):217-223.(in Chinese)
[50] 室野剛隆. 危機耐性の向上-想定を超える巨大地震への対応-[J]. Rtri Report,2016,30(5):1-4. Murono Y. Improvement of anti-catastrophe performance-Measures for unanticipated earthquake[J]. Rtri Report,2016,30(5):1-4.(in Japanese)

相似文献/References:

[1]李鹏,段启伟.基于复阻尼模型的连续刚构桥地震响应分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2013,04(04):095.
 LI Peng,DUAN Qiwei.Analysis of seismic responses of continuous rigid-framed bridge based on complex damping[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2013,04(03):095.
[2]陈之健,赵建锋,朱俊,等.LRB支座选取及其对连续梁桥减隔震效果的影响[J].地震工程与工程振动,2015,01(05):085.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2015.05.85.chenzj.013]
 CHEN Zhijian,ZHAO Jianfeng,ZHU Jun,et al.Selection of LRB and its effect on continuous girder bridge seismic isolation[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2015,01(03):085.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2015.05.85.chenzj.013]
[3]李宁,史伟,谢礼立.考虑修/改造方案优选的桥梁震后可恢复性和可持续性研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2018,(01):001.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2018.01.1.lin.001]
 LI Ning,SHI Wei,XIE Lili.Research on post-earthquake resilience and sustainability performance of bridge considering bridge retrofit schemes[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2018,(03):001.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2018.01.1.lin.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-3-27;改回日期:2017-4-28。
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAK17B04-3);中央公益事业基本科研业务专项基金项目(2014A01,2016B06);国家自然科学基金项目(51278471);中国地震局创新团队发展计划项目
作者简介:黄勇(1969-),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事桥梁抗震和结构健康监测研究.E-mail:huangyong@iem.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01