[1]刘盼,孙吉泽,陈冬柏.2016年新西兰Kaikoura Mw7.8地震动参数分布特征研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2020,40(03):223-227.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2020.03.223.liup.023]
 LIU Pan,SUN Jize,CHEN Dongbai.Spatial distribution of ground motion parameters during the 2016 Mw7.8 Kaikoura earthquake[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2020,40(03):223-227.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2020.03.223.liup.023]
点击复制

2016年新西兰Kaikoura Mw7.8地震动参数分布特征研究
分享到:

《地震工程与工程振动》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
40
期数:
2020年03
页码:
223-227
栏目:
论文
出版日期:
2020-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatial distribution of ground motion parameters during the 2016 Mw7.8 Kaikoura earthquake
作者:
刘盼1 孙吉泽2 陈冬柏1
1. 陕西省地震局, 陕西 西安 710068;
2. 中国地震局 地球物理研究所, 北京 100081
Author(s):
LIU Pan1 SUN Jize2 CHEN Dongbai1
1. Shaanxi Earthquake Agency, Xi’an 710068, China;
2. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China
关键词:
CAVArias烈度PGAKailkoura地震地震动
Keywords:
CAVArias intensityPGAKaikoura earthquakeearthquake ground motion
分类号:
P315.9
DOI:
10.13197/j.eeev.2020.03.223.liup.023
摘要:
2016年11月13日发生在新西兰的Mw7.8地震是一起由多个破裂组成的复杂地震事件,地震持续时间长,滑移速率慢,辐射能少,使得整体的加速度峰值偏小。结合断层的滑移分布,对记录到的强地面运动进行分析发现,地震的影响范围主要集中在南岛东北部,具有很明显的方向性效应,断层沿着震中向东北方向进行滑动,在东西两侧的影响较小,沿断层滑动方向上地震动峰值大,CAV和Arias烈度也主要分布在沿着断层破裂方向上,具有两个明显峰值区,这和断层滑移量分布相一致,在断层滑移量影响范围外,Arias烈度和CAV迅速衰减到零,最大值都集中在最大破裂所在的WDFS台站附近。结合地震动预测方程进行分析发现,在100 km以内,地震动预测方程与PGA有较好的对应关系,但随着断层距的增加,在100 km以上,观测值逐渐低于地震动预测方程。综合研究表明,地震动参数主要受到断层滑移量和断层距的影响,且滑移量的影响要大于断层距的影响。
Abstract:
The Kaikoura Mw7.8 earthquake occurred in Novermber 13,2016, which is one of the most complex event included several rupture fault. The Kaikoura earthquake has long duration and slow slip velocity, so the radiated energy and the whole PGA record are small. In this study, we analyzed the strong motion records with distribution of rupture slip. The results indicated the influence of earthquake grouped in the north-eastern region of south-island and have obvious forward directivity effect. The faults slip from epicenter along the north-eastern direction and have small influences in east and west sides. The PGA, CAV and Arias intensity distribute along the slip direction and have same distribution with rupture slip which have two peak value areas, and the maximum value lies in the WDFS station. Comparison with the GMPE indicated that the PGA has good correspondence within 100 km, and beyond 100 km the observed PGA small than the GMPE. The research indicated that the parameters influenced by surface slip than the fault distance.

参考文献/References:

[1] Bradley B A. A New Zealand-specific pseudospectral acceleration ground-motion prediction equation for active shallow crustal earthquakes based on foreign models[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2013, 103(3):1801-1822.
[2] Bradley B A, Razafindrakoto HNT, Polak V. Ground-motion observations from the 14 November 2016Mw 7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand, earthquake and insights from broadband simulations[J]. Seismological Research Letters,2017,88(3):740-756.
[3] Cabanas L, Benito B, Herraiz M. An approach to the measurement of the potential structural damage of earthquake ground motions[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,1997, 26(1):79-92.
[4] Chiou S J, Youngs R R. An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24(1):173-215.
[5] Hollingsworth J, Ye L, Avouac J P. Dynamically triggered slip on a splay fault in the Mw 7.8, 2016 Kaikoura (New Zealand) earthquake[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017, 44(8):3517-3525.
[6] Hamling I J, Hreinsdóttir S, Clark K, et al. Complex multifault rupture during the 2016Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand[J]. Science, 2017, 356(6334):eaam7194.
[7] 孟令媛,史保平.2012.2011年新西兰Mw6.1地震震源过程及强地面运动特征初步分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(5):1601-1612. MENG Lingyuan, SHI Baoping. Source rupture process for the february 21, 2011, Mw6.1, New Zealand earthquake and the characteristics of near-field strong ground motion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(5):1601-1612.(in Chinese)
[8] M7.8-54km NNE of Amberley, New Zealand [EB/OL].[2017/07/06].https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us1000778i#executive.
[9] M7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake:Latest updates.[2017-07-06]. http://info.geonet.org.nz/display/home/2016/11/14/M7.8+Kaikoura+Earthquake%3A+Latest+updates.
[10] 胡进军, 吴旺成, 谢礼立. 地震动累积绝对速度相关参数研究进展与分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2013, 33(5):1-8. HU Jinjun, WU Wangcheng, XIE Lili. Review and analysis of cumulative absolute velocity related parameters of ground motion[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2013, 33(5):1-8.(in Chinese)
[11] O’Hara T F, Jacobson J P. Standardization of the cumulative absolute velocity[R]. Electric Power Research Inst., 1991.
[12] Reed J W, Kassawara R P. A criterion for determining exceedance of the operating basis earthquake[J]. Nuclear Engineering & Design, 1989, 123(2):387-396.
[13] 林淋, 孙景江. 不同地震动参数与地震烈度相关性对比研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2011, 31(1):6-10. LIN Lin, SUN Jingjiang. Comparative research on correlation between strong ground motion parameters and seismic intensity[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2011, 31(1):6-10.(in Chinese)
[14] 陈志高, 黄俊. 累积绝对速度CAV在中国三代核电站地震监测中的应用[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2016, 36(5):467-470. CHEN Zhigao, HUANG Jun. Application of standardized cumulative absolute velocity for the third generation nuclear power plant earthquake monitoring[J]. Journal of Geodesy & Geodynamics,2016, 36(5):467-470.(in Chinese)

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-10-05;改回日期:2019-12-25。
基金项目:陕西省地震局启航与创新基金项目(QC201814,QC201917);中国地震局“监测、预报、科研三结合”项目(3JH-201901070)
作者简介:刘盼(1987-),男,工程师,硕士,主要从事强震观测与分析研究.E-mail:liupan_0214@163.com
通讯作者:孙吉泽(1982-),男,工程师,博士,主要从事地震动模拟与地震危险性分析研究.E-mail:sunjize@cea-igp.ac.c
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01